Comments for Crestone Eagle http://crestoneeagle.com News from Crestone, the San Luis Valley and beyond Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:23:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on SolarReserve Public Hearing set for Feb. 2 Large-scale facility with 656 ft. high towers proposed for Center area by cologirl3510 http://crestoneeagle.com/2012/01/17/solarreserve-public-hearing-set-for-feb-2-large-scale-facility/#comment-291 cologirl3510 Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:23:41 +0000 http://crestoneeagle.com/?p=3388#comment-291 PV system 30MW on 216 acres. Solar Reserve 100mw on 4000 acres Really We could do PV systems and land owners AND the county will all benefit. The actual valley will benefit as a whole. NOT some huge corporation with tax loopholes that will take everything and screw us all! Oh yeah...and it's experimental. Need I say anything else... And what jobs.... Jobs of expertise that will no doubt be brought in... for 30 months and then 30 jobs left over. Um I think there's more than 30 people in the valley. Just sayin.... Not to mention this will tap out our lines and no one will be able to do PV sytems. So once again.. the little guy get squashed. Come on people GET REAL! PV system 30MW on 216 acres.
Solar Reserve 100mw on 4000 acres

Really

We could do PV systems and land owners AND the county will all benefit. The actual valley will benefit as a whole.

NOT some huge corporation with tax loopholes that will take everything and screw us all! Oh yeah…and it’s experimental. Need I say anything else…

And what jobs…. Jobs of expertise that will no doubt be brought in… for 30 months and then 30 jobs left over. Um I think there’s more than 30 people in the valley. Just sayin….

Not to mention this will tap out our lines and no one will be able to do PV sytems. So once again.. the little guy get squashed.

Come on people

GET REAL!

]]> Comment on Saguache County Clerk recalled by more than 2-to-1 vote by Frank http://crestoneeagle.com/2012/01/30/saguache-county-clerk-recalled-by-more-than-2-to-1-vote/#comment-290 Frank Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:14:13 +0000 http://crestoneeagle.com/?p=3495#comment-290 ". Hopefully, in the long run, this will prove to be a valuable experience for the voting public, and the important elections of 2012 will be handled correctly." What valuable experience for voters? The voters did nothing wrong. “. Hopefully, in the long run, this will prove to be a valuable experience for the voting public, and the important elections of 2012 will be handled correctly.” What valuable experience for voters? The voters did nothing wrong.

]]> Comment on Global interdependence: The case for large-scale green energy by Ceal http://crestoneeagle.com/2012/01/30/global-interdependence-the-case-for-large-scale-green-energy/#comment-289 Ceal Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:56:50 +0000 http://crestoneeagle.com/?p=3488#comment-289 You can read Ceal's response (with live links) here: http://slvrenewablecommunities.blogspot.com/2012/01/response-to-global-interdependence-case.html You can read Ceal’s response (with live links) here:
http://slvrenewablecommunities.blogspot.com/2012/01/response-to-global-interdependence-case.html

]]> Comment on Global interdependence: The case for large-scale green energy by Ceal http://crestoneeagle.com/2012/01/30/global-interdependence-the-case-for-large-scale-green-energy/#comment-288 Ceal Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:44:38 +0000 http://crestoneeagle.com/?p=3488#comment-288 Response to “Global interdependence: The case for large-scale green energy” by Lee Temple, from Ceal Smith, Founder, San Luis Valley Renewable Communities Alliance and co-founder, Solar Done Right. “We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking that created them.” Albert Einstein Taking a closer look reveals that there is no free lunch in ecology, we have better (faster, cheaper, smarter) choices and taking the first thing offered, just because someone else is offering it and its easy, may not be a real solution. If we truly wish to address global climate change, we may have no choice but to take our energy future in our own hands by insisting on policies that promote a more democratic, decentralized energy system. “Large projects are criticized for greater local disruption, while small ones are less disruptive (and less carbon-reducing)” Ceal response: On a per megawatt basis, point of use distributed generation (DG) is 7-20% more efficient and cost-effective than remote, industrial renewable energy (see Betting on the Wrong Solar Horse, by Bill Powers). The cost and inefficiencies of transporting electricity over long distances is considerable. New transmission can cost $ millions per/mile, impact the environment and incur line losses up to 15% in hot areas. In Colorado, these losses effectively negate the net gain of generating solar for export purposes in the San Luis Valley. “It recognizes that neighboring bio-regions aren’t always so renewable-energy-fortunate. Being a good bio-regional neighbor means sharing our “solar wealth” with less fortunate neighboring bio-regions. Ceal response: Wind and sun are available virtually everywhere, so renewable energy can be economically harnessed at small scales across the country, state and community. According to Energy Self-Reliant States, Colorado has the resources to be 100% energy independent using available solar, wind, small hydro, geothermal and biofuel resources. By creating path dependencies, remote, corporate-owned industrial solar primarily benefits the 1%, while depriving local communities of the opportunity to develop, and benefit (beyond a handful of unskilled jobs) from their own renewable resources. Lee is ignoring the seriousness of the potential negative impacts of a large-scale industrial project that will inevitably have a massive ecological footprint. Nothing like it has ever been built in Colorado or on the face of the earth. His assumption that SolarReserve will lead to a net-reduction in C02 emissions is unproven. How much concrete will be produced to build two 656’ towers, how much diesel fuel burned to transport all of the material and supplies to our remote location? What is the footprint of the additional transmission needed to move SLV energy to the front-range? Sulfur Hexafluoride/SF6 is a green house gas 23,900 times more potent as CO2. Most SF6 emissions are generated in long-distance transmission of electrical power, the more remote a new facility is, and the more additional miles of transmission line needed to deliver its power to the grid, the higher the SF6 burden of each new generating facility will be. In 2010 the EPA estimated average emissions of between .58 and .89 kilograms of SF6 for every mile of transmission line per year over the last decade. Please see: Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Industrial Solar. Scientists at the University of California, Riverside have reason to believe that the industrial solar may have a larger footprint than people think. More research is needed before we plow ahead blindly with massive industrial development. I agree with Lee that we don’t have time to do the research to know if industrial solar really will result in emissions reductions, but we can’t afford to give it the benefit of the doubt, so wouldn’t it me wiser to go with distributed generation where there is no doubt that its faster, cheaper, more efficient and incentivizes energy conservation? Will the solar energy generated remotely actually replace fossil fuel use, or will it simply be an add-on to the ever-growing energy pie, perhaps even encouraging people to use ever more energy, because, hey, its clean! Locally generated solar has obvious and tangible built-in incentives that are proven to reduce energy consumption at the point of use. We know that power towers kill birds but the only study we have is on a 10 MW pilot plant long since decommissioned in CA. It is possible this facility could cause the death of hundreds of thousands of migrant birds and bats over its lifetime. But most of the impacts of SolarReserve are unknown; microclimate impacts, visual (including retinal effects of glint and glare from 35,000 – 25 foot square helistat mirrors), groundwater, fire, other wildlife impacts and more. “The large-scale approach thus seeks fair, balanced trade between the valley and the larger world, a sharing of the corporate infrastructure burden, and accepting at least some of the responsibility for sustaining it here. Thankfully, multi-decade transformative leadership by far-sighted visionaries like Paul Hawken, Al Gore, Amory Lovins, William McDonough and Jeremy Rifkin pioneered green commerce models that have improved the global business activities of established corporations and new ones like SolarReserve” Ceal Response: I find the statement to be enormously naïve. The energy industry, in particular, has amassed more political power than any industry, at any time in history. Industry tycoons like the Koch brothers have effectively undermined global efforts to combat climate change and move aggressively towards a clean energy economy. The proponents of industrial solar and wind are, for the most part, the same Wall Street corporations (BP, Chevron, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, et al.) who are responsible for our global environmental and economic crisis. Solar is simply a good business deal as long as the federal government continues to hand out massive subsidies. Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins, Jeremy Rifkin, Bill McKibben and energy visionaries are, in fact, calling for massive deployment of distributed generation and Energy Democracy. Please see: Jeremy Rifkin, the Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral (i.e. distributed) Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy and the World Emory Lovins, Small is Profitable Hermann Scheer, the Solar Economy Al Weinrub, Community Power (endorsed by Bill McKibben, Angelina Galiteva, Paul Gipe, James Woolsey, John Farrell, Randy Hayes and others) John Farrell, Democratizing the Electricity System – A vision for the 21st Century Grid “Large-scale efforts in these major sectors will thus mitigate the lion’s share, followed by multi-scale global energy-efficiency improvements, smart growth, land-use-practice improvements, and the small-scale approach, over the next 20-30 years. Clearly, more approaches are better than one!” Ceal Response: Please see, 4 Myths about Large-scale Solar, by Janine Blaeloch. “SolarReserve is currently SLV’s only larger-scale, high-effectiveness, quick-turn-around option. Each of its two planned 100 MW phases (75% of SLV’s peak load ea.) take 2.5 years to build. When fully completed, it would single-handedly mitigate the majority of SLV’s carbon footprint—2.4 million/tons/CO2/yr! Most or all the power will stay here short-term, enhancing our electrical resilience, self-reliance and energy-independence while small-scale projects ramp up” Ceal Response: A very undesirable side-effect, ignored by Lee is that it would require a $.5 billion new transmission line and open the door to the large-scale industrialization of the San Luis Valley. Relative to 2.5 years, it takes almost no time to permit and install distributed solar. With the right policies (Property Assessed Clean Energy and German style Feed-in tariffs), there is no limit to how much distributed generation could be installed in the SLV. A recent report by Colorado Harvesting Energy Network revealed that San Luis Valley farmers could generate 2,500 MW, using just the pivot crop circle corners. This would generate magnitudes more economic benefit for the valley while still allowing for up to 800 MW export on the upgraded existing transmission system. Germany is the world’s leader in solar energy, with 7,400 MW of solar installed in 2010 alone, 80% of Germany’s solar generation is owned locally by small farmers, businesses and communities. FunFactoid: The entire continental US has more solar energy than Germany, even rainy Seattle, WA has 15% more solar than Germany! Please see, 4 Myths about Large-scale Solar, by Janine Blaeloch. In the bigger picture, SolarReserve will greatly support the health and vitality of the larger whole, the global interdependence of humanity and nature. If we still had lots of time, and the SLV was an idyllic, autonomous world unto itself, we could legitimately wait for superior technologies and/or small-is-beautiful methodologies to save the day. Unfortunately though, time is short, we don’t live in a vacuum, and we can’t continue shirking the CC heavy-lifting. Although it’s imperfect, one trait makes SolarReserve admirable and worthy of our support: its huge, global-interdependence-recognizing, carbon-saving paradigm is doable, right here, right now, and hopefully, in time. Ceal response: While this path may well be the easiest, it is clearly not the fastest, smartest, most cost effective or efficient. It will serve to drive the cost of solar energy up (thus limiting how much we will generate), perpetuate our dependence on far-away energy sources and the same consumption-driven old energy system that got us into the global warming mess in the first place. Einstein was right when he said, “we can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking that created them”. It’s time for a new energy paradigm. Response to “Global interdependence: The case for large-scale green energy” by Lee Temple, from Ceal Smith, Founder, San Luis Valley Renewable Communities Alliance and co-founder, Solar Done Right.
“We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking that created them.”
Albert Einstein
Taking a closer look reveals that there is no free lunch in ecology, we have better (faster, cheaper, smarter) choices and taking the first thing offered, just because someone else is offering it and its easy, may not be a real solution. If we truly wish to address global climate change, we may have no choice but to take our energy future in our own hands by insisting on policies that promote a more democratic, decentralized energy system.
“Large projects are criticized for greater local disruption, while small ones are less disruptive (and less carbon-reducing)”
Ceal response: On a per megawatt basis, point of use distributed generation (DG) is 7-20% more efficient and cost-effective than remote, industrial renewable energy (see Betting on the Wrong Solar Horse, by Bill Powers). The cost and inefficiencies of transporting electricity over long distances is considerable. New transmission can cost $ millions per/mile, impact the environment and incur line losses up to 15% in hot areas. In Colorado, these losses effectively negate the net gain of generating solar for export purposes in the San Luis Valley.
“It recognizes that neighboring bio-regions aren’t always so renewable-energy-fortunate. Being a good bio-regional neighbor means sharing our “solar wealth” with less fortunate neighboring bio-regions.
Ceal response: Wind and sun are available virtually everywhere, so renewable energy can be economically harnessed at small scales across the country, state and community. According to Energy Self-Reliant States, Colorado has the resources to be 100% energy independent using available solar, wind, small hydro, geothermal and biofuel resources. By creating path dependencies, remote, corporate-owned industrial solar primarily benefits the 1%, while depriving local communities of the opportunity to develop, and benefit (beyond a handful of unskilled jobs) from their own renewable resources.

Lee is ignoring the seriousness of the potential negative impacts of a large-scale industrial project that will inevitably have a massive ecological footprint. Nothing like it has ever been built in Colorado or on the face of the earth. His assumption that SolarReserve will lead to a net-reduction in C02 emissions is unproven. How much concrete will be produced to build two 656’ towers, how much diesel fuel burned to transport all of the material and supplies to our remote location?

What is the footprint of the additional transmission needed to move SLV energy to the front-range? Sulfur Hexafluoride/SF6 is a green house gas 23,900 times more potent as CO2. Most SF6 emissions are generated in long-distance transmission of electrical power, the more remote a new facility is, and the more additional miles of transmission line needed to deliver its power to the grid, the higher the SF6 burden of each new generating facility will be. In 2010 the EPA estimated average emissions of between .58 and .89 kilograms of SF6 for every mile of transmission line per year over the last decade. Please see: Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Industrial Solar. Scientists at the University of California, Riverside have reason to believe that the industrial solar may have a larger footprint than people think. More research is needed before we plow ahead blindly with massive industrial development.

I agree with Lee that we don’t have time to do the research to know if industrial solar really will result in emissions reductions, but we can’t afford to give it the benefit of the doubt, so wouldn’t it me wiser to go with distributed generation where there is no doubt that its faster, cheaper, more efficient and incentivizes energy conservation?

Will the solar energy generated remotely actually replace fossil fuel use, or will it simply be an add-on to the ever-growing energy pie, perhaps even encouraging people to use ever more energy, because, hey, its clean! Locally generated solar has obvious and tangible built-in incentives that are proven to reduce energy consumption at the point of use.

We know that power towers kill birds but the only study we have is on a 10 MW pilot plant long since decommissioned in CA. It is possible this facility could cause the death of hundreds of thousands of migrant birds and bats over its lifetime. But most of the impacts of SolarReserve are unknown; microclimate impacts, visual (including retinal effects of glint and glare from 35,000 – 25 foot square helistat mirrors), groundwater, fire, other wildlife impacts and more.

“The large-scale approach thus seeks fair, balanced trade between the valley and the larger world, a sharing of the corporate infrastructure burden, and accepting at least some of the responsibility for sustaining it here. Thankfully, multi-decade transformative leadership by far-sighted visionaries like Paul Hawken, Al Gore, Amory Lovins, William McDonough and Jeremy Rifkin pioneered green commerce models that have improved the global business activities of established corporations and new ones like SolarReserve”
Ceal Response: I find the statement to be enormously naïve. The energy industry, in particular, has amassed more political power than any industry, at any time in history. Industry tycoons like the Koch brothers have effectively undermined global efforts to combat climate change and move aggressively towards a clean energy economy. The proponents of industrial solar and wind are, for the most part, the same Wall Street corporations (BP, Chevron, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, et al.) who are responsible for our global environmental and economic crisis. Solar is simply a good business deal as long as the federal government continues to hand out massive subsidies.
Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins, Jeremy Rifkin, Bill McKibben and energy visionaries are, in fact, calling for massive deployment of distributed generation and Energy Democracy. Please see:
Jeremy Rifkin, the Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral (i.e. distributed) Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy and the World
Emory Lovins, Small is Profitable
Hermann Scheer, the Solar Economy
Al Weinrub, Community Power (endorsed by Bill McKibben, Angelina Galiteva, Paul Gipe, James Woolsey, John Farrell, Randy Hayes and others)
John Farrell, Democratizing the Electricity System – A vision for the 21st Century Grid
“Large-scale efforts in these major sectors will thus mitigate the lion’s share, followed by multi-scale global energy-efficiency improvements, smart growth, land-use-practice improvements, and the small-scale approach, over the next 20-30 years. Clearly, more approaches are better than one!”
Ceal Response: Please see, 4 Myths about Large-scale Solar, by Janine Blaeloch.
“SolarReserve is currently SLV’s only larger-scale, high-effectiveness, quick-turn-around option. Each of its two planned 100 MW phases (75% of SLV’s peak load ea.) take 2.5 years to build. When fully completed, it would single-handedly mitigate the majority of SLV’s carbon footprint—2.4 million/tons/CO2/yr! Most or all the power will stay here short-term, enhancing our electrical resilience, self-reliance and energy-independence while small-scale projects ramp up”
Ceal Response: A very undesirable side-effect, ignored by Lee is that it would require a $.5 billion new transmission line and open the door to the large-scale industrialization of the San Luis Valley.
Relative to 2.5 years, it takes almost no time to permit and install distributed solar. With the right policies (Property Assessed Clean Energy and German style Feed-in tariffs), there is no limit to how much distributed generation could be installed in the SLV. A recent report by Colorado Harvesting Energy Network revealed that San Luis Valley farmers could generate 2,500 MW, using just the pivot crop circle corners. This would generate magnitudes more economic benefit for the valley while still allowing for up to 800 MW export on the upgraded existing transmission system.
Germany is the world’s leader in solar energy, with 7,400 MW of solar installed in 2010 alone, 80% of Germany’s solar generation is owned locally by small farmers, businesses and communities.
FunFactoid: The entire continental US has more solar energy than Germany, even rainy Seattle, WA has 15% more solar than Germany!
Please see, 4 Myths about Large-scale Solar, by Janine Blaeloch.
In the bigger picture, SolarReserve will greatly support the health and vitality of the larger whole, the global interdependence of humanity and nature. If we still had lots of time, and the SLV was an idyllic, autonomous world unto itself, we could legitimately wait for superior technologies and/or small-is-beautiful methodologies to save the day. Unfortunately though, time is short, we don’t live in a vacuum, and we can’t continue shirking the CC heavy-lifting. Although it’s imperfect, one trait makes SolarReserve admirable and worthy of our support: its huge, global-interdependence-recognizing, carbon-saving paradigm is doable, right here, right now, and hopefully, in time.
Ceal response: While this path may well be the easiest, it is clearly not the fastest, smartest, most cost effective or efficient. It will serve to drive the cost of solar energy up (thus limiting how much we will generate), perpetuate our dependence on far-away energy sources and the same consumption-driven old energy system that got us into the global warming mess in the first place. Einstein was right when he said, “we can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking that created them”. It’s time for a new energy paradigm.

]]> Comment on SolarReserve Public Hearing set for Feb. 2 Large-scale facility with 656 ft. high towers proposed for Center area by sunfarmer http://crestoneeagle.com/2012/01/17/solarreserve-public-hearing-set-for-feb-2-large-scale-facility/#comment-287 sunfarmer Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:52:56 +0000 http://crestoneeagle.com/?p=3388#comment-287 Matie Bell, This will not be a "pilot project." This is a proven technology, with research largely paid for with taxpayer dollars, that is perfect for the SLV's cool sun and abundant, pre-disturbed landbase. Here are two quotes regarding the Solar Two project in Nevada: "We're proud of Solar Two's success as it marks a significant milestone in the development of large-scale solar energy projects," Former U.S. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson "This technology has been successfully demonstrated and is ready for commercialization. From 1994 to 1999, the Solar Two project demonstrated the ability of solar molten salt technology to provide long-term, cost effective thermal energy storage for electricity generation." Boeing And Solar1, the biggest drawback for PV is its inability to store the power it generates. We need this breakthrough technology on the electrical grid in order to replace our current energy paradigm, which is dominated by dirty fossil fuels. And water use for the project is reportedly lower than the site's current agricultural use. Matie Bell,

This will not be a “pilot project.” This is a proven technology, with research largely paid for with taxpayer dollars, that is perfect for the SLV’s cool sun and abundant, pre-disturbed landbase. Here are two quotes regarding the Solar Two project in Nevada:

“We’re proud of Solar Two’s success as it marks a significant milestone in the development of large-scale solar energy projects,” Former U.S. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson

“This technology has been successfully demonstrated and is ready for commercialization. From 1994 to 1999, the Solar Two project demonstrated the ability of solar molten salt technology to provide long-term, cost effective thermal energy storage for electricity generation.” Boeing

And Solar1, the biggest drawback for PV is its inability to store the power it generates. We need this breakthrough technology on the electrical grid in order to replace our current energy paradigm, which is dominated by dirty fossil fuels. And water use for the project is reportedly lower than the site’s current agricultural use.

]]> Comment on Global interdependence: The case for large-scale green energy by sunfarmer http://crestoneeagle.com/2012/01/30/global-interdependence-the-case-for-large-scale-green-energy/#comment-286 sunfarmer Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:05:04 +0000 http://crestoneeagle.com/?p=3488#comment-286 Thanks Lee Temple, for your big-picture perspective on this very important topic. Here's my thinking on this: If NIMBY-ism prevents this safe, proven technology from being utilized here in the SLV's perfect "cool sun" environment, then where the heck will it be implemented? We've spent billions of taxpayer dollars developing this technology. Let's use it! And, if not now, when the earth and mankind needs these kinds of big ideas, then when? The smaller is better idea (i.e. distributed generation) just doesn't work in today's economic climate, where industry and government have removed nearly every incentive for clean energy. The energy industry can be made to do solar right, on a large scale, where it can have a big impact. This project, which allows for solar energy storage, is a beacon in the smog created by Big Coal and can slow down the mining industry's penchant for fracking our way to so-called energy independence. This is the SLV's chance to literally and figuratively "shine." Let's work together to make this happen! Thanks Lee Temple, for your big-picture perspective on this very important topic. Here’s my thinking on this: If NIMBY-ism prevents this safe, proven technology from being utilized here in the SLV’s perfect “cool sun” environment, then where the heck will it be implemented? We’ve spent billions of taxpayer dollars developing this technology. Let’s use it! And, if not now, when the earth and mankind needs these kinds of big ideas, then when? The smaller is better idea (i.e. distributed generation) just doesn’t work in today’s economic climate, where industry and government have removed nearly every incentive for clean energy. The energy industry can be made to do solar right, on a large scale, where it can have a big impact. This project, which allows for solar energy storage, is a beacon in the smog created by Big Coal and can slow down the mining industry’s penchant for fracking our way to so-called energy independence. This is the SLV’s chance to literally and figuratively “shine.” Let’s work together to make this happen!

]]> Comment on SolarReserve Public Hearing set for Feb. 2 Large-scale facility with 656 ft. high towers proposed for Center area by solar1 http://crestoneeagle.com/2012/01/17/solarreserve-public-hearing-set-for-feb-2-large-scale-facility/#comment-285 solar1 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:47:53 +0000 http://crestoneeagle.com/?p=3388#comment-285 I think it important for discussion in this public hearing that the big advantages (very little water, much lower profile) of a photovoltaic module installation vs CSP be brought out if it has not already. Please read this article- http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_19498442 from Dec 2011. It discusses the trend of these big CSP projects in CA changing from CSP technology to simple PV technology because it is also CHEAPER! Although I am not in favor of any industrial project covering thousands of acres in the SLV PV module installation is more benign than CSP. I think it important for discussion in this public hearing that the big advantages (very little water, much lower profile) of a photovoltaic module installation vs CSP be
brought out if it has not already. Please read this article-
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_19498442
from Dec 2011. It discusses the trend of these big CSP projects in CA changing from CSP technology to simple PV technology because it is also CHEAPER! Although I am not in favor of any industrial project covering thousands of acres in the SLV PV module installation is more benign than CSP.

]]> Comment on Crestone Telecom loan approved by lex http://crestoneeagle.com/2011/12/01/crestone-telecom-loan-approved/#comment-282 lex Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:13:47 +0000 http://crestoneeagle.com/?p=3234#comment-282 "The 6th Great Extinction... is laced by... wireless technologies... " > http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2011//RIR-111208.php Love is an action verb. “The 6th Great Extinction…
is laced by…
wireless technologies… ”

> http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2011//RIR-111208.php

Love is an action verb.

]]> Comment on Last chance for commenting: Air Force Flyover in the SLV by @nugzy Last chance for commenting: Air Force Flyover in the SLV « garzuela part 2 garzuela returns http://crestoneeagle.com/2010/11/15/last-chance-for-commenting-air-force-flyover-in-the-slv/#comment-281 @nugzy Last chance for commenting: Air Force Flyover in the SLV « garzuela part 2 garzuela returns Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:27:23 +0000 http://crestoneeagle.com/?p=2133#comment-281 [...] http://crestoneeagle.com/2010/11/15/last-chance-for-commenting-air-force-flyover-in-the-slv/ Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. Tags crestone Categories Uncategorized [...] [...] http://crestoneeagle.com/2010/11/15/last-chance-for-commenting-air-force-flyover-in-the-slv/ Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. Tags crestone Categories Uncategorized [...]

]]> Comment on Three weeks on Wall Street: Crestonian joins ‘Occupy Wall Street’ by occupyheart http://crestoneeagle.com/2011/10/31/crestonian-joins-occupy-wall-street/#comment-279 occupyheart Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:42:26 +0000 http://crestoneeagle.com/?p=3159#comment-279 Mother Bear of the world... , bawling for joy...--- as her cubs ... come alive... dancing... for their very lives... in... chorus. Mother Bear of the world… ,
bawling for joy…—

as her cubs …
come alive…

dancing…
for their very lives…

in…
chorus.

]]>